1980 Daihatsu Taft vs. 2010 Kia Cee'd

To start off, 2010 Kia Cee'd is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 1,975 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cee'd (141 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. (44 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 321 kg more than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1980 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Kia Cee'd. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Kia Cee'd (187 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Daihatsu Taft. (63 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2010 Kia Cee'd will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Daihatsu Taft.

Compare all specifications:

1980 Daihatsu Taft 2010 Kia Cee'd
Make Daihatsu Kia
Model Taft Cee'd
Year Released 1980 2010
Engine Size 956 cc 1975 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 44 HP 141 HP
Engine RPM 5400 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 63 Nm 187 Nm
Torque RPM 4200 RPM 4600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type 4WD Front
Vehicle Weight 1020 kg 1341 kg
Vehicle Length 3370 mm 4240 mm
Vehicle Width 1470 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1830 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2030 mm 2660 mm