1980 Mitsubishi Debonair vs. 1989 Ford Ranger

To start off, 1989 Ford Ranger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Debonair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Debonair would be higher. At 2,554 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mitsubishi Debonair is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mitsubishi Debonair (111 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1989 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mitsubishi Debonair should accelerate faster than 1989 Ford Ranger.

Because 1989 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Mitsubishi Debonair. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1980 Mitsubishi Debonair 1989 Ford Ranger
Make Mitsubishi Ford
Model Debonair Ranger
Year Released 1980 1989
Body Type Sedan Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2554 cc 2300 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 111 HP 109 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 4800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Vehicle Length 4680 mm 4690 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]