1980 Renault 20 vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Renault 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Renault 20 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1242 kg more than 1980 Renault 20.
Because 2013 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Renault 20. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 1980 Renault 20 has manual transmission. 1980 Renault 20 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Renault 20 | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | 20 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1647 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 376 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1188 kg | 2430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 6290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1925 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 4180 mm |
