1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche vs. 1972 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 1540 kg more than 1972 ZAZ 966.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche has automatic transmission and 1972 ZAZ 966 has manual transmission. 1972 ZAZ 966 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Rolls-Royce Corniche | 1972 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | ZAZ |
Model | Corniche | 966 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 885 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 27 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2280 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2170 mm |