1981 Abarth A 112 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Abarth A 112 | 2000 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | A 112 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 963 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 97 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2210 mm |