1981 Audi UR vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Audi UR would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1981 Audi UR. (197 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1981 Audi UR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 670 kg more than 1981 Audi UR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Audi UR. (285 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Audi UR.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Audi UR | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | UR | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 87 L |