1981 Austin Allegro vs. 1997 Jaguar XK8
To start off, 1997 Jaguar XK8 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Jaguar XK8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Jaguar XK8 (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 1981 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Jaguar XK8 should accelerate faster than 1981 Austin Allegro.
Because 1997 Jaguar XK8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Jaguar XK8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Jaguar XK8 (393 Nm) has 323 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Austin Allegro. (70 Nm). This means 1997 Jaguar XK8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Austin Allegro. 1997 Jaguar XK8 has automatic transmission and 1981 Austin Allegro has manual transmission. 1981 Austin Allegro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Jaguar XK8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Austin Allegro | 1997 Jaguar XK8 | |
Make | Austin | Jaguar |
Model | Allegro | XK8 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 3996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 290 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 393 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2590 mm |