1981 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 16 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Cadillac Cimarron | 1963 Holden EJ | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | Cimarron | EJ |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2844 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1134 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2680 mm |
