1981 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1990 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1990 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 6 kg more than 1981 Mazda Cosmo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Mazda Cosmo | 1990 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | Cosmo | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1990 |
| Engine Size | 1970 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1098 kg | 1104 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1910 mm |
