1981 Seat Ronda vs. 1978 Seat 131
To start off, 1981 Seat Ronda is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Seat 131. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Seat 131 would be higher. At 1,714 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Seat Ronda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 53 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Seat 131 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1981 Seat Ronda.
Because 1978 Seat 131 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Seat 131. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Seat Ronda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Seat Ronda (98 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Seat 131. (94 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1981 Seat Ronda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Seat 131.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Seat Ronda | 1978 Seat 131 | |
Make | Seat | Seat |
Model | Ronda | 131 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1714 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 98 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 965 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2500 mm |