1981 Zastava 102 vs. 2013 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-V is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,354 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Honda CR-V (182 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Honda CR-V weights approximately 831 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Honda CR-V (221 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Zastava 102 | 2013 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Zastava | Honda |
| Model | 102 | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2354 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 182 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 1601 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1654 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2620 mm |
