1981 Zastava 750 vs. 2002 BMW Z3

To start off, 2002 BMW Z3 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW Z3 (228 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW Z3 weights approximately 760 kg more than 1981 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW Z3 (301 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 750. 2002 BMW Z3 has automatic transmission and 1981 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1981 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 BMW Z3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: