1982 Alfa Romeo GTV vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Alfa Romeo GTV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Alfa Romeo GTV would be higher. At 2,792 cc, 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 500 kg more than 1982 Alfa Romeo GTV.
Because 1982 Alfa Romeo GTV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Alfa Romeo GTV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 1982 Alfa Romeo GTV has manual transmission. 1982 Alfa Romeo GTV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Alfa Romeo GTV | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
Model | GTV | BLS |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1569 cc | 2792 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 247 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2680 mm |