1982 Audi 100 vs. 1985 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1985 Jeep CJ is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 100 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 85 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Jeep CJ weights approximately 186 kg more than 1982 Audi 100.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Audi 100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Jeep CJ (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 100. (124 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1985 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Audi 100 | 1985 Jeep CJ | |
| Make | Audi | Jeep |
| Model | 100 | CJ |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 124 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1296 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2380 mm |
