1982 Audi 100 vs. 2011 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2011 Ford Ranger is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 100 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1982 Audi 100. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 100.
Because 2011 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Ranger (322 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 100. (124 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2011 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 100 | 2011 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 100 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 322 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3193 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 74 L |