1982 Audi 80 vs. 1986 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1986 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 80 would be higher. At 5,030 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1982 Audi 80.
Because 1986 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Audi 80 | 1986 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | 80 | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 5030 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3090 mm |
