1982 Audi 80 vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 80 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 640 kg more than 1982 Audi 80.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Audi 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (297 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 80. (100 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Audi 80 | 2008 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Audi | Jeep |
| Model | 80 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1296 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 100 Nm | 297 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 98.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 73.4 mm | 86.7 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 72 L |
