1982 Audi UR vs. 2005 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi UR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi UR would be higher. At 2,226 cc (5 cylinders), 1982 Audi UR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Audi UR (197 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (86 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Audi UR should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Because 1982 Audi UR is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Audi UR will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Audi UR (270 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Ranger. (135 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1982 Audi UR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi UR | 2005 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | UR | Ranger |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2226 cc | 1753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1302 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2990 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 80 L |