1982 Autobianchi A 112 vs. 2010 Ford Escape
To start off, 2010 Ford Escape is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Autobianchi A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Autobianchi A 112 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Escape weights approximately 1190 kg more than 1982 Autobianchi A 112.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Ford Escape has automatic transmission and 1982 Autobianchi A 112 has manual transmission. 1982 Autobianchi A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford Escape will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Autobianchi A 112 | 2010 Ford Escape | |
Make | Autobianchi | Ford |
Model | A 112 | Escape |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 265 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4717 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2050 mm | 2824 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 72 L |