1982 BMW 328 vs. 2009 Mazda Tribute

To start off, 2009 Mazda Tribute is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 328. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 328 would be higher. At 2,793 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 BMW 328 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 BMW 328 weights approximately 381 kg more than 2009 Mazda Tribute.

Because 2009 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 BMW 328. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 BMW 328 (210 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda Tribute. (184 Nm). This means 1982 BMW 328 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda Tribute.

Compare all specifications:

1982 BMW 328 2009 Mazda Tribute
Make BMW Mazda
Model 328 Tribute
Year Released 1982 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2793 cc 2483 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 153 HP
Torque 210 Nm 184 Nm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Vehicle Weight 1506 kg 1125 kg
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2630 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]