1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1952 Holden FX
To start off, 1982 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Buick Skyhawk (101 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 110 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Buick Skyhawk | 1952 Holden FX | |
Make | Buick | Holden |
Model | Skyhawk | FX |
Year Released | 1982 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 51 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2620 mm |