1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1966 Simca 1200S
To start off, 1982 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Simca 1200S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Simca 1200S would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Buick Skyhawk (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1966 Simca 1200S. (79 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1966 Simca 1200S. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 225 kg more than 1966 Simca 1200S. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Simca 1200S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Simca 1200S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Buick Skyhawk | 1966 Simca 1200S | |
Make | Buick | Simca |
Model | Skyhawk | 1200S |
Year Released | 1982 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1204 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2240 mm |