1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1969 Seat 600
To start off, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Seat 600 would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (163 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1969 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1969 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1969 Seat 600 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
Model | Camaro | 600 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4995 cc | 767 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 325 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2010 mm |