1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2005 Peugeot 206
To start off, 2005 Peugeot 206 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Peugeot 206 (108 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Peugeot 206 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Peugeot 206, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Peugeot 206. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Peugeot 206.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 2005 Peugeot 206 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Peugeot |
Model | Camaro | 206 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2835 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 192 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2450 mm |