1982 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2003 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2003 Pagani Zonda is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 7,010 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 360 kg more than 2003 Pagani Zonda.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Chevrolet Impala has automatic transmission and 2003 Pagani Zonda has manual transmission. 2003 Pagani Zonda will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Chevrolet Impala will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Impala | 2003 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | Chevrolet | Pagani |
Model | Impala | Zonda |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 7010 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 542 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5460 mm | 4395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2055 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1151 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2730 mm |