1982 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2002 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2002 Ford Mustang is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Mustang weights approximately 460 kg more than 1982 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2002 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler Le Baron | 2002 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Le Baron | Mustang |
Year Released | 1982 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 385 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2580 mm |