1982 Daihatsu Taft vs. 2013 Mazda 2
To start off, 2013 Mazda 2 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 2,764 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Daihatsu Taft is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 2 (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (68 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Daihatsu Taft weights approximately 287 kg more than 2013 Mazda 2.
Because 1982 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Daihatsu Taft (165 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda 2. (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Daihatsu Taft will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Daihatsu Taft | 2013 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Daihatsu | Mazda |
Model | Taft | 2 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Size | 2764 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1043 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1476 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2489 mm |