1982 Dodge Omni vs. 1966 Mercedes-Benz 250
To start off, 1982 Dodge Omni is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercedes-Benz 250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercedes-Benz 250 would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Mercedes-Benz 250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercedes-Benz 250 weights approximately 365 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 1966 Mercedes-Benz 250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercedes-Benz 250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge Omni | 1966 Mercedes-Benz 250 | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Omni | 250 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 2496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
Top Speed | 146 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 82 L |