1982 Dodge Omni vs. 1977 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 1982 Dodge Omni is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Datsun 280Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Datsun 280Z would be higher. At 2,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Datsun 280Z is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Datsun 280Z weights approximately 309 kg more than 1982 Dodge Omni.
Because 1977 Datsun 280Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Datsun 280Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge Omni | 1977 Datsun 280Z | |
Make | Dodge | Datsun |
Model | Omni | 280Z |
Year Released | 1982 | 1977 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 2753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1304 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4399 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1631 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2304 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 60 L |