1982 Ford Fairlane vs. 2004 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2004 Mercury Sable is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Sable (155 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1982 Ford Fairlane. (125 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Sable weights approximately 113 kg more than 1982 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Fairlane (296 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercury Sable. (251 Nm). This means 1982 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Fairlane | 2004 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Fairlane | Sable |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4093 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 296 Nm | 251 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2760 mm |