1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2010 Nissan NP300
To start off, 2010 Nissan NP300 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan NP300 weights approximately 204 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2010 Nissan NP300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Nissan NP300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2010 Nissan NP300 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Nissan |
Model | Cutlass | NP300 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 112 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2960 mm |