1982 Toyota Celica vs. 2004 Honda Integra
To start off, 2004 Honda Integra is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Honda Integra (217 HP) has 102 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Because 1982 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Toyota Celica | 2004 Honda Integra | |
| Make | Toyota | Honda |
| Model | Celica | Integra |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1986 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 217 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4374 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1725 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1394 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2350 mm |
