1982 TVR Tasmin vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 TVR Tasmin. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 TVR Tasmin would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1366 kg more than 1982 TVR Tasmin.
Because 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 TVR Tasmin. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1982 TVR Tasmin has manual transmission. 1982 TVR Tasmin will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 TVR Tasmin | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | TVR | Jeep |
Model | Tasmin | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 6400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 459 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 2336 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2156 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2916 mm |