1982 Volkswagen Polo vs. 2010 Ford S-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford S-Max is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford S-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford S-Max (160 HP) has 121 more horse power than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford S-Max should accelerate faster than 1982 Volkswagen Polo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Ford S-Max has automatic transmission and 1982 Volkswagen Polo has manual transmission. 1982 Volkswagen Polo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford S-Max will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Volkswagen Polo | 2010 Ford S-Max | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Ford |
| Model | Polo | S-Max |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1043 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 160 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
