1983 Abarth A 112 vs. 2006 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2006 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1346 kg more than 1983 Abarth A 112.
Because 2006 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Abarth A 112. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Jeep Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1983 Abarth A 112 has manual transmission. 1983 Abarth A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Jeep Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Abarth A 112 | 2006 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Abarth | Jeep |
Model | A 112 | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 2776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 2031 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2660 mm |