1983 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1988 Alfa Romeo 164
To start off, 1988 Alfa Romeo 164 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Alfa Romeo 164 (185 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Alfa Romeo 164 should accelerate faster than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Alfa Romeo 164 weights approximately 270 kg more than 1983 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Cadillac Cimarron | 1988 Alfa Romeo 164 | |
Make | Cadillac | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Cimarron | 164 |
Year Released | 1983 | 1988 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2843 cc | 2959 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2670 mm |