1983 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1960 Fairthorpe Electron
To start off, 1983 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Fairthorpe Electron would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 710 kg more than 1960 Fairthorpe Electron.
Because 1960 Fairthorpe Electron is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Fairthorpe Electron. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Chrysler Le Baron | 1960 Fairthorpe Electron | |
| Make | Chrysler | Fairthorpe |
| Model | Le Baron | Electron |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 948 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 42 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 490 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 45 L |
