1983 Dodge Daytona vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1983 Dodge Daytona is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Dodge Daytona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Dodge Daytona (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Dodge Daytona should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 35 kg more than 1983 Dodge Daytona.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Dodge Daytona (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1983 Dodge Daytona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Dodge Daytona | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Dodge | Triumph |
| Model | Daytona | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1135 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2700 mm |
