1983 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1967 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1983 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford Fairlane (122 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 390 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Fiat Ritmo | 1967 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Ritmo | Fairlane |
Year Released | 1983 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1496 cc | 3930 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 122 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 68 L |