1983 Jaguar XJR vs. 2010 Ascari KZ1
To start off, 2010 Ascari KZ1 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ascari KZ1 weights approximately 450 kg more than 1983 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Jaguar XJR | 2010 Ascari KZ1 | |
Make | Jaguar | Ascari |
Model | XJR | KZ1 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
Engine Size | 5343 cc | 4941 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 500 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1138 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2636 mm |