1983 Renault 18 vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Renault 18. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Renault 18 would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 91 more horse power than 1983 Renault 18. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault 18.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Renault 18. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Renault 18. (103 Nm). This means 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Renault 18.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Renault 18 | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Renault | Citroen |
Model | 18 | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1983 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 103 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76.1 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |