1983 Skoda L vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Skoda L would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1983 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1983 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 725 kg more than 1983 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt (210 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Skoda L | 2010 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Skoda | Mitsubishi |
Model | L | Colt |
Year Released | 1983 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1046 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9:01 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 47 L |