1983 Volvo 240 vs. 2011 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2011 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1983 Volvo 240. (122 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1983 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 654 kg more than 1983 Volvo 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Volvo 240. (170 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Volvo 240 | 2011 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Volvo | Mazda |
Model | 240 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1983 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2127 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1964 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5085 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2875 mm |