1984 Chevrolet Citation II vs. 2006 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chevrolet Citation II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chevrolet Citation II would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Chevrolet Citation II weights approximately 344 kg more than 2006 Ford Mustang.
Because 2006 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chevrolet Citation II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1984 Chevrolet Citation II has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1984 Chevrolet Citation II will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Chevrolet Citation II | 2006 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Citation II | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 4606 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 1244 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2730 mm |
