1984 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2002 Volvo S60 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo S60 weights approximately 371 kg more than 1984 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2002 Volvo S60 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Chrysler Le Baron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Chrysler Le Baron | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Le Baron | S60 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 295 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1571 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 70 L |