1984 Citroen CX vs. 1952 Talbot Baby
To start off, 1984 Citroen CX is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 2,690 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Baby is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Citroen CX (168 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1952 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1952 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Baby weights approximately 241 kg more than 1984 Citroen CX.
Because 1952 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Citroen CX | 1952 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Citroen | Talbot |
Model | CX | Baby |
Year Released | 1984 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1409 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3130 mm |