1984 Lotus Etna vs. 2010 BMW 116
To start off, 2010 BMW 116 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 2010 BMW 116. (116 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 2010 BMW 116.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 BMW 116. (260 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 BMW 116.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Lotus Etna | 2010 BMW 116 | |
Make | Lotus | BMW |
Model | Etna | 116 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3946 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 331 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 408 Nm | 260 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4239 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1748 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1421 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2660 mm |