1985 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1952 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1985 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1985 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1000 kg more than 1952 Triumph Mayflower.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1985 Cadillac Brougham | 1952 Triumph Mayflower | |
Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
Model | Brougham | Mayflower |
Year Released | 1985 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5032 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 37 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2140 mm |