1985 Jeep CJ vs. 1990 Mazda 626

To start off, 1990 Mazda 626 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Mazda 626 (116 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1985 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1985 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Mazda 626 weights approximately 9 kg more than 1985 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Mazda 626 (184 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1990 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.

Compare all specifications:

1985 Jeep CJ 1990 Mazda 626
Make Jeep Mazda
Model CJ 626
Year Released 1985 1990
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 2184 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 85 HP 116 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 150 Nm 184 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1296 kg 1305 kg
Vehicle Length 3900 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 1670 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1840 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2380 mm 2580 mm