1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1968 Oldsmobile 442
To start off, 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Oldsmobile 442. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Oldsmobile 442 would be higher. At 6,556 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Oldsmobile 442 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Oldsmobile 442 weights approximately 305 kg more than 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1968 Oldsmobile 442 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Oldsmobile 442. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1985 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1968 Oldsmobile 442 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Cutlass | 442 |
| Year Released | 1985 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 6556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1625 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2850 mm |
